Reduce the luxury tax and not encourage luxury consumption, but some residents in income increase, and on the basis of some proper consumption demand should be met. (our reporter LiuXianYun interview arrangement) first make clear what is a "luxury" lower taxes for the rich is luxury burden, against social justice? If the expansion of domestic demand, the state tax increase? The two parties argue, look all makes sense. Exactly what the results bring lower taxes, I'm afraid the experts Louis Vuitton Damier Graphite Canvas Hanging Toiletry Kit Black N41419 also difficult to accurately measure. But we can easily find that the parties of the dispute is not actually to clarify the concept of clear luxury goods. Should say, as our country income growth, the original part already entered the city white-collar luxury home, gradually lose the luxury properties, such as estee lauder, lancome, clinique and other brands of cosmetics, and iPad, iPhone4 mobile phones and other electronic products, and also is the popular overseas residents on the part of the goods. Therefore, we might consider to have the popularization of some intermediate goods reduce consumption tax, in better meet the public demand and, at the same time, can reduce overseas shopping and act as purchasing agency of tax avoidance and tax evasion bring behavior, the tax at home; High-end consumer goods to is still remain high tax rates. So, already can better to play the role of tax adjusting income distribution, also can appropriately increase tax base, expand the scale of tax. We urgently need to reasonable definition on luxury goods, we really want what to lower taxes? If not in uniform on the platform of the dialogue, the debate becomes a one-way conversation, may goes sour. (LiuXianYun) for the last few days, imported luxury this shouldn't lower taxes in the topic of experts and scholars, ordinary common people cause extensive debate between. Our reporter interviewed the Treasury fiscal respectively, deputy director of institute of science and the ministry of commerce LiuShangXi deputy director of the institute of consumer economy ZhaoPing. It's just a big argument focus issues were discussed. Meeting a point: the parts of luxury whether become the necessities of life? LiuShangXi: luxury not necessities, taxation regulate the gap between rich and poor has the function of the zhao ping: some high-grade products has become people to improve the quality of life necessities LiuShangXi made clear: "luxury goods is not the necessities of life, there is no need to lower taxes, and the luxury tax. Besides the main consumption group is rich, of imported luxury consumption tax is to the rich on taxes, and played the role of regulate the gap between rich and poor, to social justice." LiuShangXi think that, in not lower taxes, luxury consumption in China has very hot.
According to the world luxury association issued 2011 new report, Chinese mainland last year's luxury market consumption volume has reached 10.7 billion us dollars, accounting for a quarter of the global share. China is expected to surpass Japan in 2012, becoming the first big luxury consumer. Now, many of the luxury brands are global in China to open a shop, and will the sales network to two, three city extension. "Our domestic luxury consumption already accounts for 25% of the world, and our GDP is less than 10% of the world's, it had apparently is not reasonable. If again through the lower taxes to stimulate luxury consumption, this kind of irrational 'high' will be much too much." ZhaoPing said: "the current our country import taxes collection model has couldn't keep up with the changes in the structure of residents' consumption." With the development of economy, some upscale product is no longer in the sense of original luxury goods, and become people to improve the quality of life necessities. This part of the goods, the domestic middle-income people can afford, must restore the necessaries of life or improve sexual consumer goods colors. Setting import duties when tax rates, again to this part of the goods should not be impose high tax rates, and in its reclassified, a reduction of import duties on space. Meeting point 2: lower taxes is leading to luxury price cut? LiuShangXi: even lower taxes, luxury general will not easily fall since "value" zhao ping: tax cuts can promote brand goods import, the more competition to lower prices LiuShangXi said, for the definition of luxury goods may be different, but the most important feature of luxury goods, is the price of the expensive to foil the identity "noble", also can let owners through the show off and content. Therefore, general won't easily came from luxury "value", the more impossible like ordinary commodities that go "small profits and quick turnover" pathway. Luxury is only a few people can afford consumption, even lower taxes, also may not be able to reduce its high price. For high income earners, they won't because the price high and not to buy, on the contrary, that most people would not namely "high" just meet their "conspicuous consumption" mentality. ZhaoPing think, after tax cuts, can promote more goods imported brand, forming a more effective competition situation, promote a lower price. Now, some products in foreign just very ordinary mass consumer goods, the price is not expensive, but in the high tax burden after, be artificially shaped into a false sense of luxury, this is not normal. International famous brand sales system really has a lot of problems. At home, some in high-grade goods sales level a lot, and generally regional agent bargaining power is not high, foreign manufacturers may control agent and the shelves, maintain high prices. China still exist in the collection of the retail channel fee, "buckle point" and so on the unspoken rules, could push up the price of imported luxury goods. But it can't be refused to reduce the tax burden in high-grade goods of reason, instead, it should be for high-grade goods "burden". At the same time, we should further regulating commercial order, vigorously promote "February factory" and so on the new marketing mode of development, reduce the circulation, reduce the price of high-grade goods. Meeting point 3: when cause people to buy luxury goods abroad? LiuShangXi: fled leak tariffs, import VAT and consumption tax to make people buy luxury goods from abroad the price is much lower than the domestic price zhao ping: comprehensive import tax rates too high for domestic consumers have to to overseas or airport duty-free shop to buy, to the consumer trouble LiuShangXi points out, in the consumption tax collection range into commodities, whether imported or domestic, want to impose consumption tax, this also reflected the unity of the tax system and fair. Luxury consumption tax is in the link of import import tax, domestic consumption tax is in production or luxury retail link to the collection of, such as into
No comments:
Post a Comment